2001 Mercury Sable Problems, Complaints & Recalls

Source: NHTSA · Updated Feb 17, 2022 · 430 owner complaints analyzed

Compared with other Sable years
Far more complaints than other years 3rd of 14 for complaints
NHTSA crash rating
Not rated

Owners have filed 430 complaints with NHTSA about the 2001 Mercury Sable. That ranks 3rd out of 14 Sable model years for complaints. The most reported problem area is suspension (204 complaints, 47%), typically at around 72,185 miles. Complaints mention 32 crashes, 7 fires, 30 injuries. There are 8 safety recalls covering this model year. NHTSA has opened 8 defect investigations involving it.

Mercury Sable
2008 Mercury Sable photographed in Waldorf, Maryland , USA.. Representative photo; appearance varies by model year. Photo: IFCAR, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Complaints are unverified owner reports and are not adjusted for sales volume.

Compare with another car

Most common 2001 Mercury Sable problems

Complaints grouped by the part of the car owners reported, with the median mileage when the problem happened.

Suspension204 · ~72,185 mi
Vehicle Speed Control61 · ~96,000 mi
Service Brakes, Hydraulic33 · ~46,594 mi
Air Bags27 · ~60,000 mi
Electrical System26 · ~47,250 mi
Engine and Engine Cooling23 · ~56,354 mi
Power Train22 · ~48,600 mi
Exterior Lighting13 · ~64,253 mi
Seat Belts12 · ~52,150 mi
Equipment11 · ~53,800 mi
Problem areaComplaintsShareMedian milesOwners mention mostTypical repair cost
Suspension problems20447%72,185“rear coil” (45%)$1,050
Vehicle Speed Control problems6114%96,000“cruise control cable” (10%)—
Service Brakes, Hydraulic338%46,594——
Air Bags276%60,000——
Electrical System266%47,250——
Engine and Engine Cooling235%56,354——
Power Train225%48,600——
Exterior Lighting133%64,253——
Seat Belts123%52,150——
Equipment113%53,800——
Structure113%85,395——
Visibility102%50,000——
Fuel System, Gasoline92%80,746——
Steering72%55,000——
Service Brakes51%90,000——
Tires51%34,450——
Engine41%110,000——
Seats41%121,000——
Fuel/propulsion System31%98,000——
Interior Lighting20%113,700——
Latches/locks/linkages20%145,000——
Electronic Stability Control (esc)10%145,000——
Fuel System, Other10%13,000——
Parking Brake10%85,000——
Service Brakes, Air10%9,542——
Unknown or Other10%———
Visibility/wiper10%120,576——
Wheels10%130,000——

One complaint can list several problem areas, so shares can add up to more than 100%.

Complaints by year received

Peak: 2005, with 60 complaints
2000: 220002001: 292002: 3020022003: 212004: 3520042005: 60602006: 4920062007: 482008: 4620082009: 222010: 1520102011: 132012: 1820122013: 122014: 720142015: 102016: 520162018: 32019: 320192020: 12022: 12022

n = 430 complaints · Source: NHTSA

2001 Mercury Sable recalls (8)

Tap a recall to see the problem, the risk and the fix.

Suspension:front:springs:coil springsJul 15, 2004 · NHTSA campaign 04V332000 · 899,060 vehicles

Problem: On certain passenger vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, the front coil springs could fracture due to corrosion associated with salt used on the roadways during the winter. A fractured spring could move past the spring seat and contact a front tire.

Risk: If this occurs, the tire may rupture resulting in a rapid air loss, which could result in a crash.

Fix: Dealers will install protective spring shields. In addition, ford is extending the warranty coverage of the front coil springs in all other states, for fracture only, up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. If the vehicle has already accumulated more than 150,000 miles, this coverage will last until july 31, 2005. If either front coil spring fractures, dealers will replace both front springs at no charge to the owner. An interim notice was sent to owners on august 2, 2004. Parts are now available for the 2000-2001 my vehicles and owners were sent a letter on january 10, 2005, advising them to bring in their vehicles for repair parts are expected to be available for the 1999 my vehicles by the end of february 2005 and owners of these vehicles will be notified then. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

Exterior lighting:brake lights:switchMar 2, 2004 · NHTSA campaign 04V106000 · 938,789 vehicles

Problem: Certain passenger vehicles are being recalled to correct a problem with a malfunctioning stop lamp switch and/or associated wiring. This malfunctioning could render the stop lamps inoperable or cause them to stay on all the time. This could cause confusion to a following driver, which could lead to a crash.

Risk: In addition, if the switch and/or associated wiring fail in the open position, the brake lights will not actuate and the driver will not be able to shift the vehicle out of "park" if they fail in the closed position, the brake lights will remain on, which will not allow the speed control to be activated. This could also cause the battery to discharge.

Fix: Dealers will remove the stop lamp switch and associated wiring assembly and install a newly designed stop lamp switch and wire assembly. Owner notification is expected to begin on april 5, 2004. Owners should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

Service brakes, hydraulic:pedals and linkagesOct 2, 2002 · NHTSA campaign 02V266000 · 369,614 vehicles

Problem: Certain passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable padels are being recalled in order to adjust the brake and accelerator pedals to a minimum of 50 mm of lateral separation. Simultaneous application of both the brake and accelerator pedals could result in an increase in engine rpm.

Risk: This could result in a customer experiencing an "unintended vehicle speed increase" or a perceived "unable to stop" condition.

Fix: Owners will be instructed as to the proper way to set the position of the pedals and to take their vehicles to a dealer to have the spacing between the brake and accelerator pedals measured. If the spacing is found to be less than 50 mm, the dealer will adjust the pedals to increase the distance between them to greater than 50 mm. Owner notification began october 28, 2002. Owners who do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.

Visibility:windshield wiper/washer:motorAug 8, 2001 · NHTSA campaign 01V258000 · 1,083,000 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, and light and medium duty pickup trucks. A switch located in the plastic cover of the wiper motor gear case could malfunction and overheat, potentially resulting in loss of intermittent wiper function, loss of wiper park function, complete loss of wiper function, or ignition of the plastic cover material. Switch malfunction is most likely to occur when the intermittent setting of the wipers is being used, or when snow or ice obstructs the blades from returning to the "parked" position at the bottom of the windshield. These vehicles were built at the following assembly plants: atlanta plant from 2/11/00 through 7/31/00; chicago plant from 2/14/00 through 8/4/00; kansas city plant from 2/26/00 to 9/4/00; kentucky truck plant from 2/18/00 to 8/31/00; michigan truck plant from 2/23/00 through 8/3/00; norfolk plant from 2/21/00 through 7/27/00; wayne stamping and assembly plant from 2/25/00 through 8/15/00; and wixom plant from 2/15/00 through 8/8/00.

Risk: Loss of visibility while driving increases the risk of a crash.

Fix: Dealers will inspect the date code on the wiper motor. Motors built with the suspect time frame will have the wiper motor gear case cover replaced. Owner notification began august 20, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-866-436-7332.

Seat belts:front:buckle assemblyApr 27, 2001 · NHTSA campaign 01V144000 · 4,567 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: passenger cars. The seat belt buckle tongue may not fully eject from the buckle assembly when the release button is pushed slowly. This condition could also result in a partial latch of the tongue in the buckle.

Risk: In the event of a vehicle crash, the vehicle occupant may not be properly restrained, possibly resulting in personal injury or death.

Fix: Dealers will replace the driver and right front passenger seat belt buckles. Owner notification began may 4, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

Exterior lighting:tail lights:switchMar 12, 2001 · NHTSA campaign 01V078000 · 157,000 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: passenger vehicles equipped with adjustable pedals. If the grease from the adjustable pedal assembly enters the stop lamp switch, it can contaminate the contacts leading to carbon build up, and potentially, a short circuit.

Risk: A short circuit could lead to either the brake lamps staying on, or to a loss of brake lamp function, increasing the risk of a crash.

Fix: Dealers will replace the brake lamp switch and wipe down the adjustable pedal assembly to remove excess grease. Owner notification began march 22, 2001. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

Equipment:other:owners/service/other manualNov 28, 2000 · NHTSA campaign 00V396000 · 495,000 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: certain sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and passenger vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of fmvss 225, "child restraint anchorage systems." the affected expedition/navigator owner guides do not identify the locations of seating positions equipped with tether anchorages, and do not provide instructions for securing child seats to these tether anchorages. The f150 sc owner guides do not provide the procedure for securing child seats to the tether anchorages. The taurus/sable owner guides do not identify the center rear seating position as having latch compatible lower anchorages.

Risk: In the event of a crash, the child seat may not be properly attached increasing the risk of injury to the child.

Fix: Owners will be provided with owner guide inserts revised to provide the required information, and instructions for affixing these inserts to their owner guides. Customers will also be advised that if they prefer, their dealer will affix the inserts to their owner guides.

Seat belts:front:anchorageAug 24, 2000 · NHTSA campaign 00V240000 · 5,961 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The child safety seat anchor latch (iso-fix anchor) fasteners do not have adequate residual torque. The anchors are secured to the floor pan with a reinforcement plate that has two studs that extend upward through the floor pan and the iso-fix anchor. The sealer on the floor pan could cause a soft joint and, even if the nuts are properly torqued, road vibrations could cause the nut to work its way completely off the stud.

Risk: The anchor may not hold the child safety seat in position during an accident, increasing the risk of injury to the occupant of the child safety seat.

Fix: Dealers will remove and re-install the bracket nut using a torque retention material (red loctite). Owner notification began september 11, 2000. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1-800-392-3673.

To see whether a specific car still has an open recall, enter its VIN on NHTSA's official recall lookup. You can also decode a VIN here.

NHTSA defect investigations

  • Speed control cable damage (PE12033) — opened Oct 24, 2012, closed Jun 26, 2013.
  • Rear coil spring fracture (EA06002) — opened Jan 24, 2006, closed Feb 5, 2007.
  • Rear coil spring fracture (PE05054) — opened Sep 27, 2005, closed Jan 24, 2006.
  • Brake/accelerator pedal application (RP03001) — opened Oct 31, 2003, closed Mar 23, 2004.
  • Brake light switch failure (RQ03008) — opened Oct 23, 2003, closed Mar 5, 2004, led to recall 04V106000.
  • Frontal air bag non-deployment in crash (EA03010) — opened Jul 2, 2003, closed Jun 23, 2004.
  • Frontal air bag non-deployment in crash (PE03002) — opened Jan 6, 2003, closed Jul 2, 2003.
  • Brake/accel pedal separation (PE02035) — opened Mar 15, 2002, closed Oct 22, 2002, led to recall 02V266000.

Recent owner reports

Short excerpts of the latest complaints filed with NHTSA, with personal details removed. Full reports can be searched on NHTSA.gov.

Lately my car has been over accelerating to about 4,000 rpm’s at random moments. I almost got into a wreck today and I was driving 30 mph. I’ve cleaned the throttle body and the idle air control valve and still the same issue. The car only has 113,000 miles on it but now I’m too scared to…

Vehicle Speed Control · received Feb 17, 2022 · NHTSA complaint 11452347

I got in my car started to drive and heard something snap then smoke came from the hood and the car pulled hard right. I immediately stopped and parked the car. The coil spring broke and dug into my front passenger tire and it pulled the axle out of the cv joint.i was in allentown,pa. On a main…

Steering · received Apr 22, 2020 · NHTSA complaint 11321890

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 mercury sable. While driving 45 mph, the vehicle accelerated when the brake pedal was depressed. The failure occurred without warning. The contact had to depress the brake pedal with full force to get the vehicle to eventually stop. The dealer was not contacted. The…

Service Brakes · received Mar 25, 2019 · NHTSA complaint 11191343

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 MERCURY SABLE. WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH, THE BRAKE WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. ALSO, WHILE APPROACHING A RED LIGHT WITH THE BRAKE PEDAL DEPRESSED, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOORBOARD TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT…

Service Brakes · received Mar 18, 2019 · NHTSA complaint 11189691

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 MERCURY SABLE. WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH ON THE HIGHWAY, THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL SUDDENLY DROPPED DOWN AND THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED TO 120 MPH. THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO NEUTRAL, BUT THE RPMS CONTINUED REVVING AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY. WHEN THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SLOW DOWN, THE…

Engine · received Feb 15, 2019 · NHTSA complaint 11180282

Other Mercury Sable years

← 2000 Sable · 2002 Sable →

See all Mercury Sable problems by year, every Mercury model, or the VIN decoder.

Similar Mercury models

Embed this 2001 Mercury Sable badge on your site

Copy this code into your blog or forum post. It shows live complaint and recall counts and links back here.

Frequently asked questions

What are the most common problems with the 2001 Mercury Sable?

Owners most often report suspension, vehicle speed control, service brakes, hydraulic problems. The top one, suspension, accounts for 204 complaints.

Was there a recall on the 2001 Mercury Sable?

Yes, 8 safety recalls. Enter your VIN at NHTSA.gov to check whether the repairs were done on your car.

Was the 2001 Mercury Sable a good year?

Complaint data can't fully answer that, because counts aren't adjusted for sales. Compared with other Sable model years, the 2001 has far more complaints than most years. Always get a pre-purchase inspection and check the VIN for open recalls.