1996 Chrysler Sebring Suspension Problems

Source: NHTSA · Updated Oct 28, 2022 · 70 complaints analyzed

Owners have filed 70 complaints with NHTSA about suspension problems on the 1996 Chrysler Sebring, 20% of all complaints for this model year. Half of the reports with a mileage happened before 76,000 miles. The words owners use most often: “ball joint” (41% of reports).

What owners describe

Phrases that appear unusually often in these complaints compared with complaints about other cars.

  • Ball joint: mentioned in 29 of 70 complaints (41%)
  • Control arm: mentioned in 10 of 70 complaints (14%)
  • Front wheel: mentioned in 9 of 70 complaints (13%)
  • Please provide: mentioned in 7 of 70 complaints (10%)

At what mileage do suspension problems happen?

Based on 11 complaints that reported the odometer reading.

Under 10k miles0 · 0%
10k–25k miles1 · 9%
25k–50k miles1 · 9%
50k–75k miles3 · 27%
75k–100k miles3 · 27%
100k–150k miles3 · 27%
150k+ miles0 · 0%

How serious are the reports?

Of 70 complaints, 5 mention a crash.

Chrysler Sebring suspension complaints by model year

Peak: 1996, with 70 complaints
1995: 461995461996: 70701997: 281997281998: 26261999: 231999232000: 15152001: 292001292002: 37372003: 8200382004: 26262005: 6200562006: 10102007: 7200772008: 442010: 320103

n = 338 complaints · Source: NHTSA

Model yearSuspension complaintsShare of that yearMedian miles
2010 Sebring33%28,444
2008 Sebring42%72,000
2007 Sebring72%16,339
2006 Sebring108%93,000
2005 Sebring68%112,539
2004 Sebring2612%80,000
2003 Sebring819%87,750
2002 Sebring3718%77,000
2001 Sebring2912%82,598
2000 Sebring1516%110,000
1999 Sebring2313%100,462
1998 Sebring2610%129,000
1997 Sebring2813%140,000
1996 Sebring7020%76,000
1995 Sebring4635%97,000

When owners reported it

Peak: 2001, with 17 complaints
1996: 2199621997: 1199711998: 3199831999: 131999132000: 102000102001: 172001172002: 9200292003: 6200362004: 5200452005: 2200522006: 1200612007: 120071

n = 70 complaints · Source: NHTSA

Related recalls (3)

Suspension:front:control arm:lower ball jointDec 18, 2000 · NHTSA campaign 00V421002 · 393,796 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. If the rubber boots on the lower lateral arm ball joints of the front suspension were damaged during assembly, dirt and water can intrude. Also, mmc has added the potential of leaking moisture, which can cause the ball stud to corrode.

Risk: This condition could cause the lower lateral arm ball joint to separate, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. This campaign supercedes mmc's previous safety recall campaign, see 99v-066.

Fix: Dealers will inspect the lower lateral arm ball joint for wear. Ball joints that exhibit wear beyond the established tolerance will be replaced with newly designed lateral arm ball joints. Ball joints that are within the established tolerance will be cleaned and a special sealant will be applied to prevent intrusion of moisture.

Suspension:front:control arm:lower ball jointApr 5, 1999 · NHTSA campaign 99V066003 · 165,857 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. If the rubber boots on the lower lateral arm ball joints of the front suspension were damaged during assembly, dirt and water can intrude.

Risk: This condition could cause the lower lateral arm ball joint to separate, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Fix: Dealers will inspect the rubber boots, and if the boot is damaged, they will replace the lower lateral arm and ball joint on the affected vehicles.

Suspension:front:control arm:lower ball jointNov 13, 1997 · NHTSA campaign 97V201000 · 599,000 vehicles

Problem: Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The lower control arm ball joint can separate due to loss of lubrication.

Risk: Separation of the ball joint could cause a loss of steering control increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.

Fix: Dealers will inspect the ball joint end housing cover seal for leakage with a high pressure air tester and the rubber boot will be visually inspected for damage. If the cover seal leaks or the boot is damaged, the lower control arm will be replaced.

What owners report

Short excerpts of recent complaints, with personal details removed. Full reports are on NHTSA.gov.

Lower lateral arm broke on our 1996 chrysler sebring. Dealer and chrysler have refused to fix the car under recall. This is the 3rd major failure and inconvenience of this part. The last failure was 8 moths ago. There is clearly a safety issue here as well as a mechanical defect. *jb

Received Jan 18, 2007 · NHTSA complaint 10179050

Dt*: the contact stated while driving 15 mph the front right tire flipped sideways, the front drive shaft sheered off the oil filter and knocked it from the manifold. This occurred on an icy road during normal braking without warning. The vehicle was pulled to the contacts home. The dealership and…

Received Feb 9, 2006 · NHTSA complaint 10149901

Dt: june 30 2005 the left front ball joint broke while driving. The consumer was driving 35 mph. There was a noise, sparks were flying, and the consumer lost steering control and bounced off a curve. There were no warning lights on the vehicle. The vehicle was recently inspected in may and no…

Received Jul 13, 2005 · NHTSA complaint 10128557

Frequently asked questions

Do all 1996 Chrysler Sebrings have suspension problems?

No. NHTSA has 70 owner complaints about suspension for the 1996 Chrysler Sebring (20% of the 343 complaints for this model year). Complaint data shows that the problem is reported, not how many of all cars sold are affected.

Was there a recall on the 1996 Chrysler Sebring suspension?

Yes: 3 safety recalls list suspension. Check your VIN on NHTSA.gov to see whether the fix was done on your car.

At what mileage do suspension problems start?

The median reported mileage is 76,000 miles: half of the reports with a mileage came before that.

What do owners say about suspension problems on the 1996 Chrysler Sebring?

The most frequent phrase is “ball joint”, in 29 of 70 complaints, followed by “control arm” (10).

Other 1996 Chrysler Sebring problems

See all 1996 Chrysler Sebring problems or suspension problems across all Sebring years.